logo logo


Computer technologies as an object and source of forensic knowledge: challenges and prospects of development

НазваComputer technologies as an object and source of forensic knowledge: challenges and prospects of development
Назва англійськоюComputer technologies as an object and source of forensic knowledge: challenges and prospects of development
АвториValerii Muzh, Taras Lechachenko
ПринадлежністьTernopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
Бібліографічний описComputer technologies as an object and source of forensic knowledge: challenges and prospects of development / Valerii Muzh, Taras Lechachenko // Scientific Journal of TNTU. — Tern.: TNTU, 2024. — Vol 115. — No 3. — P. 17–22.
Bibliographic description:Muzh V., Lechachenko T. (2024) Computer technologies as an object and source of forensic knowledge: challenges and prospects of development. Scientific Journal of TNTU (Tern.), vol 115, no 3, pp. 17–22.
УДК

343.98

Ключові слова

Tool of a crime, cybercrime, computer forensics, computer technologies, forensic science, subject of a crime.

The article is dedicated to the examination of the impact of computer technologies on the development of forensic science as a whole, as well as their characterization as objects of forensic investigation. Within the scope of the research, an analysis of three main trends of forensic science in the field of information technologies is conducted. Computer technologies are considered as a means of obtaining evidence, the subject, and the instrument of crime. We conclude that computer technologies play a significant role in the process of forensic investigations, influencing the quality of criminal investigations, and consequently, the state of legality within the state.

ISSN:2522-4433
Перелік літератури
  1. Watson S, Dehghantanha A. Digital forensics: the missing piece of the internet of things promise. Computer Fraud & Security. 2016 Jun 1;2016 (6): 5–8.
  2. Lin X, Lin X, Lagerstrom-Fife. Introductory computer forensics. Springer International Publishing; 2018.
  3. Barik K, Abirami A, Konar K, Das S. Research perspective on digital forensic tools and investigation process. Illumination of Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity and Forensics. 2022 Feb 8: 71–95.
  4. Prakash V, Williams A, Garg L, Barik P, Dhanaraj RK. Cloud-based framework for performing digital forensic investigations. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks. 2022 Dec; 29 (4): 419–41.
  5. Hemdan EE, Manjaiah DH. An efficient digital forensic model for cybercrimes investigation in cloud computing. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2021 Apr; 80: 14255-82.
  6. Schlepphorst S, Choo KK, Le-Khac NA. Digital forensic approaches for cloud service models: A survey. Cyber and Digital Forensic Investigations: A Law Enforcement Practitioner’s Perspective. 2020: 175–99.
  7. Paul Joseph D, Norman J. An analysis of digital forensics in cyber security. InFirst International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Computing: AICC 2018 2019 (pp. 701–708). Springer Singapore.
  8. Saharan S, Yadav B. Digital and cyber forensics: A contemporary evolution in forensic sciences. InCrime Scene Management within Forensic Science: Forensic Techniques for Criminal Investigations 2022 Mar 24 (pp. 267–294). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  9. Ghosh A, Majumder K, De D. A systematic review of digital, cloud and iot forensics. The “Essence” of Network Security: An End-to-End Panorama. 2021: 31–74.
  10. Mohammmed S, Sridevi R. A survey on digital forensics phases, tools and challenges. InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics: ICCII 2018 2020 (pp. 237–248). Springer Singapore.
  11.  Bilous V. V. Information technologies in forensics: setting the problem, Problems of legality, no. 121, pp. 160-170. [In Ukrainian]
  12. Rogatyuk I. V. The use of information technologies in pre-trial investigation: current state and development prospects, Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2013, no. 3, pp. 312–320. [In Ukrainian]
  13. Polyanska Yu. V. Theoretical and legal aspects of improving dactyloscopic registration, Criminal Bulletin, no. 1, 2014, pp. 70–74. [In Ukrainian]
  14. Sokyrynska O. A. Forensic and procedural issues of human identification by traces of reflection: diss. Ph.D. legal Sciences: 12.00.09, Kyiv, 2004, 198 p. [In Ukrainian]
  15. Criminal Code of Ukraine: Voice of Ukraine dated June 19, 2001, no. 107. [In Ukrainian]
  16. Bartsytska A. A. Forensic technologies: essence and place in the system of forensic science: autoref. thesis for obtaining sciences. candidate degree legal Sciences: spec. 12.00.09 “Criminal process and criminology; forensic examination; investigative activity” Odesa, 2011, 19 p. [In Ukrainian]
  17. . Semenogov V. V. Concepts and types of forensic technologies during the investigation of crimes. URL: http://www.pap.in.ua/6_2014/104.pdf. [In Ukrainian]
  18. URL: https://g-ross.com.ua/kryminalistyka.html.
  19. URL: http://cyberlab.com.ua/.
  20. Pikuliak M., Lazarovych I., Usyk M. Progressive web technology-based improvement of the distance learning adaptive system. Scientific Journal of TNTU (Tern.), 2022, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 118–127.
References:
  1. Watson S, Dehghantanha A. Digital forensics: the missing piece of the internet of things promise. Computer Fraud & Security. 2016 Jun 1;2016 (6): 5–8.
  2. Lin X, Lin X, Lagerstrom-Fife. Introductory computer forensics. Springer International Publishing; 2018.
  3. Barik K, Abirami A, Konar K, Das S. Research perspective on digital forensic tools and investigation process. Illumination of Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity and Forensics. 2022 Feb 8: 71–95.
  4. Prakash V, Williams A, Garg L, Barik P, Dhanaraj RK. Cloud-based framework for performing digital forensic investigations. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks. 2022 Dec; 29 (4): 419–41.
  5. Hemdan EE, Manjaiah DH. An efficient digital forensic model for cybercrimes investigation in cloud computing. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2021 Apr; 80: 14255-82.
  6. Schlepphorst S, Choo KK, Le-Khac NA. Digital forensic approaches for cloud service models: A survey. Cyber and Digital Forensic Investigations: A Law Enforcement Practitioner’s Perspective. 2020: 175–99.
  7. Paul Joseph D, Norman J. An analysis of digital forensics in cyber security. InFirst International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Computing: AICC 2018 2019 (pp. 701–708). Springer Singapore.
  8. Saharan S, Yadav B. Digital and cyber forensics: A contemporary evolution in forensic sciences. InCrime Scene Management within Forensic Science: Forensic Techniques for Criminal Investigations 2022 Mar 24 (pp. 267–294). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  9. Ghosh A, Majumder K, De D. A systematic review of digital, cloud and iot forensics. The “Essence” of Network Security: An End-to-End Panorama. 2021: 31–74.
  10. Mohammmed S, Sridevi R. A survey on digital forensics phases, tools and challenges. InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Informatics: ICCII 2018 2020 (pp. 237–248). Springer Singapore.
  11.  Bilous V. V. Information technologies in forensics: setting the problem, Problems of legality, no. 121, pp. 160-170. [In Ukrainian]
  12. Rogatyuk I. V. The use of information technologies in pre-trial investigation: current state and development prospects, Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2013, no. 3, pp. 312–320. [In Ukrainian]
  13. Polyanska Yu. V. Theoretical and legal aspects of improving dactyloscopic registration, Criminal Bulletin, no. 1, 2014, pp. 70–74. [In Ukrainian]
  14. Sokyrynska O. A. Forensic and procedural issues of human identification by traces of reflection: diss. Ph.D. legal Sciences: 12.00.09, Kyiv, 2004, 198 p. [In Ukrainian]
  15. Criminal Code of Ukraine: Voice of Ukraine dated June 19, 2001, no. 107. [In Ukrainian]
  16. Bartsytska A. A. Forensic technologies: essence and place in the system of forensic science: autoref. thesis for obtaining sciences. candidate degree legal Sciences: spec. 12.00.09 “Criminal process and criminology; forensic examination; investigative activity” Odesa, 2011, 19 p. [In Ukrainian]
  17. . Semenogov V. V. Concepts and types of forensic technologies during the investigation of crimes. URL: http://www.pap.in.ua/6_2014/104.pdf. [In Ukrainian]
  18. URL: https://g-ross.com.ua/kryminalistyka.html.
  19. URL: http://cyberlab.com.ua/.
  20. Pikuliak M., Lazarovych I., Usyk M. Progressive web technology-based improvement of the distance learning adaptive system. Scientific Journal of TNTU (Tern.), 2022, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 118–127.
Завантажити

Всі права захищено © 2019. Тернопільський національний технічний університет імені Івана Пулюя.