Numerical calculation of the stress-strain state of a composite shell aircraft nacelle structure
| Назва | Numerical calculation of the stress-strain state of a composite shell aircraft nacelle structure |
| Назва англійською | Numerical calculation of the stress-strain state of a composite shell aircraft nacelle structure |
| Автори | Mykhailo Prykhodko, Serhii Pyskunov, Serhii Trubachev |
| Принадлежність | National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Бібліографічний опис | Numerical calculation of the stress-strain state of a composite shell aircraft nacelle structure / Mykhailo Prykhodko, Serhii Pyskunov, Serhii Trubachev // Scientific Journal of TNTU. — Tern.: TNTU, 2025. — Vol 120. — No 4. — P. 70–77. |
| Bibliographic description: | Prykhodko M., Pyskunov S., Trubachev S. (2025) Numerical calculation of the stress-strain state of a composite shell aircraft nacelle structure. Scientific Journal of TNTU (Tern.), vol 120, no 4, pp. 70–77. |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.33108/visnyk_tntu2025.04. 070 |
| УДК | 539.3 |
| Ключові слова |
Stress-strain state, finite element method, aircraft nacelle, sandwich composite, numerical modeling, Tsai-Wu criterion |
This paper presents a numerical analysis of the stress-strain state of a composite shell structure of an aircraft engine nacelle using the finite element method (FEM). The central part of the nacelle, modeled as a cylindrical sandwich shell with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates as face sheets and a Nomex honeycomb core, is investigated under internal pressure to evaluate its static strength. Particular attention is paid to the mechanical behavior of orthotropic layers and the application of the Tsai-Wu failure criterion for determining the ultimate states. The analysis showed that the maximum values of the failure index (FI) for all layers remain below 1, while the margin of safety (MS) is positive, which confirms the structural integrity and the presence of a sufficient strength reserve under ultimate loading conditions. | |
| ISSN: | 2522-4433 |
| Перелік літератури |
1. Pyskunov S. O., Trubachev S. I., Onyshchenko Ye. Ye., Kolodezhnyi V. A. (2022). “Influence of foundation stiffness on deformation of layered building structures”. Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures, issue 108, pp. 145–155. Doi: 10.32347/2410-2547.2022.108.145-155.
2. Hexcel Corporation. HexPly® M21E/IMA Product Data Sheet, Hexcel Composites, 2015.
3. Honeycomb Core Material Product Guide – Nomex® Core Technical Data, DuPont Aerospace Materials, 2020.
4. FAA Advisory Circular AC 20-107B: Composite Aircraft Structure, Federal Aviation Administration, 2009.
5. Megson T. H. G. (2017). Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students, 6th Edition, Elsevier.
6. Arruda M. R. T. (2024). Orthotropic damage model for composite structures using Tsai-Wu failure criterion. Journal of Composite Materials. Doi: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2277849.
7. Pidgurskyi I. (2018) “Analysis of stress intensity factors obtained with the FEM for surface semielliptical cracks in the zones of structural stress concentrators”. Scientific Journal of TNTU, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 92–104. Doi: 10.33108/visnyk_tntu2018.02.092.
8. Galos J., Das R., Sutcliffe M. P., Mouritz A. P. (2022). “Review of balsa core sandwich composite structures: mechanical behaviour, failure modes and design considerations”. Composites Part B: Engineering. Doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111013.
9. Novais H. C., Oliveira R., Silva M. (2023). “Comparing Tsai-Wu and Tsai-Hill Failure Criteria for High-Pressure Vessel Design under Uncertainty”. Proceedings of the ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM).
10. Kausar A. (2023) “State-Of-The-Art of Sandwich Composite Structures: Manufacturing-to-High Performance Applications”. Journal of Composites Science, 7 (3), 102. Doi: 10.3390/jcs7030102.
11. Ye Y., Liu Z., Wang J. (2025) “Orthotropic Constitutive Modeling and Tsai-Wu Failure Criterion for CF-PEEK Composites”. Polymers, 17 (5), 891. Doi: 10.3390/polym17081076.
12. Ciolca M., Cormos R., Neagoe C. A., Hadar A. (2025) A Comparative Study on the Finite Element Analysis of Multilayered Honeycomb Composite Materials for Aerospace Structures. Materials, 18 (8), 1744. Doi: 10.3390/ma18081744.
13. Han X., Cai H., Sun J., Wei Z., Huang Y., Wang A. (2022) Numerical Studies on Failure Mechanisms of All-Composite Sandwich Structure with Honeycomb Core under Compression and Impact Loading Conditions. Polymers, 14 (19), 4047. Doi: 10.3390/polym14194047.
14. Li W., Atsushi D., Oh Y. H., Jirathearanat S., Wu Z. A., Chua B. W. (2022) Influences of skin thickness, core topology, depth and direction on flexural deformation and ductile failure of Al honeycomb-based sandwich structures. Composites Part B: Engineering, 239, 109957. Doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109957.
15. Xiao Y., Hu Y., Zhang J., Song C., Liu Z., Yu J. (2018) Dynamic bending responses of CFRP thin-walled square beams filled with aluminum honeycomb. Thin-Walled Structures, 132, pp. 494–503. Doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.023.
|
| References: |
1. Pyskunov S. O., Trubachev S. I., Onyshchenko Ye. Ye., Kolodezhnyi V. A. (2022). “Influence of foundation stiffness on deformation of layered building structures”. Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures, issue 108, pp. 145–155. Doi: 10.32347/2410-2547.2022.108.145-155.
2. Hexcel Corporation. HexPly® M21E/IMA Product Data Sheet, Hexcel Composites, 2015.
3. Honeycomb Core Material Product Guide – Nomex® Core Technical Data, DuPont Aerospace Materials, 2020.
4. FAA Advisory Circular AC 20-107B: Composite Aircraft Structure, Federal Aviation Administration, 2009.
5. Megson T. H. G. (2017). Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students, 6th Edition, Elsevier.
6. Arruda M. R. T. (2024). Orthotropic damage model for composite structures using Tsai-Wu failure criterion. Journal of Composite Materials. Doi: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2277849.
7. Pidgurskyi I. (2018) “Analysis of stress intensity factors obtained with the FEM for surface semielliptical cracks in the zones of structural stress concentrators”. Scientific Journal of TNTU, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 92–104. Doi: 10.33108/visnyk_tntu2018.02.092.
8. Galos J., Das R., Sutcliffe M. P., Mouritz A. P. (2022). “Review of balsa core sandwich composite structures: mechanical behaviour, failure modes and design considerations”. Composites Part B: Engineering. Doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111013.
9. Novais H. C., Oliveira R., Silva M. (2023). “Comparing Tsai-Wu and Tsai-Hill Failure Criteria for High-Pressure Vessel Design under Uncertainty”. Proceedings of the ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM).
10. Kausar A. (2023) “State-Of-The-Art of Sandwich Composite Structures: Manufacturing-to-High Performance Applications”. Journal of Composites Science, 7 (3), 102. Doi: 10.3390/jcs7030102.
11. Ye Y., Liu Z., Wang J. (2025) “Orthotropic Constitutive Modeling and Tsai-Wu Failure Criterion for CF-PEEK Composites”. Polymers, 17 (5), 891. Doi: 10.3390/polym17081076.
12. Ciolca M., Cormos R., Neagoe C. A., Hadar A. (2025) A Comparative Study on the Finite Element Analysis of Multilayered Honeycomb Composite Materials for Aerospace Structures. Materials, 18 (8), 1744. Doi: 10.3390/ma18081744.
13. Han X., Cai H., Sun J., Wei Z., Huang Y., Wang A. (2022) Numerical Studies on Failure Mechanisms of All-Composite Sandwich Structure with Honeycomb Core under Compression and Impact Loading Conditions. Polymers, 14 (19), 4047. Doi: 10.3390/polym14194047.
14. Li W., Atsushi D., Oh Y. H., Jirathearanat S., Wu Z. A., Chua B. W. (2022) Influences of skin thickness, core topology, depth and direction on flexural deformation and ductile failure of Al honeycomb-based sandwich structures. Composites Part B: Engineering, 239, 109957. Doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109957.
15. Xiao Y., Hu Y., Zhang J., Song C., Liu Z., Yu J. (2018) Dynamic bending responses of CFRP thin-walled square beams filled with aluminum honeycomb. Thin-Walled Structures, 132, pp. 494–503. Doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.023
|
| Завантажити |  |